Create your Event Book a demo Sign in
Tips and Tricks
9 min read

How to Write Conference Proceedings After an Academic Event

Matthieu Chartier, PhD.
Matthieu Chartier, PhD.

Published on 01 May 2025

Have you hosted or organized an academic conference and need best practices for writing conference proceedings? Fourwaves receives many emails from researchers and other academics about our tips and recommended templates for conference proceedings. We’ve created this how-to guide to help.

Conference proceedings are more than a tidy compilation of manuscripts; they are the formal, citable record of every idea unveiled at your academic conference, international conference, or symposium. 

Keep in mind that conference proceedings differ from conference papers. A conference paper is a standalone study delivered at the event; conference proceedings compile all accepted papers, along with editorial front matter, into one citable volume.

By transforming live presentations into a cohesive publication, conference organizers cement the event’s scholarly impact, give authors a ready reference for future journal submissions, and create a discoverable resource that will circulate long after the event concludes.

Read our latest article if you would like more information on what conference proceedings are.

We’ll show you how to write a proceedings paper from the ground up. You’ll learn how to pick a format that suits your field, standardize every manuscript as efficiently as possible, compile a professional-looking volume, assign Digital Object Identifiers) DOIs that boost discoverability, and finally publish and promote the finished collection. 

Follow each step and you’ll produce conference proceedings that reviewers trust, libraries index, and authors love to cite.

Step 1: Define the Proceedings Format and Structure

Before you start up your word processing application, you must have a crystal-clear vision of what you’re publishing. By determining the scope of the volume and framework, you’ll ensure every conference presentation, oral presentation and paper are based on a solid foundation. 

Choose the Type of Proceedings Volume

First, decide what kind of volume you’re assembling. Some conferences publish all accepted papers, an approach common in computer science and engineering, where speedy dissemination is prized, and peer review happens pre-event. 

Others curate selected papers, for example, award winners or studies that fit a tightly defined theme, to create a slimmer, high-impact book. 

Humanities conferences often take a third route, collecting extended abstracts or summaries that give authors room to expand their work later into a full research paper or journal article.

Your choice should match the norms of your discipline and the expectations you set in the call for papers. Spell the policy out early; no presenter wants to learn post-event that only summaries, not full manuscripts, will be included in the conference proceedings.

Organize by Topic or Session

Next, map out the internal structure. Most organizers group papers by conference theme, session track, or keynote topic so readers can move seamlessly through related work. 

If your event featured parallel tracks on climate policy and data science, for instance, keep those clusters intact in the proceedings. 

Decide as well whether you’ll include abstracts from poster sessions alongside manuscripts drawn from oral presentations. A clear table of contents built around these logical divisions will help academics as well as search engines easily navigate the volume.

Once you’ve locked down volume type and organizational logic, you’ve laid the basis for consistent templates, streamlined proofreading, and smooth publication in the following steps.

Step 2: Edit and Standardize the Papers

The architecture is set; now you need every academic paper from your local or international conference to look as though it came from the same editorial committee. That means building a rock-solid template and putting every manuscript through a final, and rigorous round of proofreading.

Create a Uniform Template

Start with a master document that fixes the order of sections, locks in heading levels, and dictates one citation style: APA-style, IEEE, Chicago, or whatever suits your field. 

For each paper’s format, embed page size, margins, page numbers, fonts and font sizes, and running numbers so nobody can wander off-template. Make sure you clearly identify examples for each paper’s title, headings, citation styles, and bibliographic references.

Send this template the moment an abstract is accepted and keep it handy for post-conference revisions; nothing saves more time or credibility than research papers that already match in paper format, references, and visual hierarchy.

Conduct Final Copy-Editing

Template or not, drafts may arrive sporting grammar and spelling mistakes. 

Schedule a dedicated copy-edit that scrubs grammar, tense shifts, and formatting creep—all while checking that each manuscript is complete: abstract, research methodology, literature review, data, and conclusions all present and properly labelled. 

Cross-verify every in-text citation against the reference list, then run one last spelling pass (or, better, hire a specialist academic proofreader). When the dust settles, your proceedings will read like a single, polished research paper.

Step 3: Compile the Proceedings Document

Your conference papers are now clean and consistent. The next step is to stitch them into a single volume that readers (and library databases) can browse in seconds. This stage is part editorial orchestration, part data-entry discipline.

Table of Contents and Metadata

Start with a detailed table of contents that does more than list page numbers. For each proceedings paper, include the full paper title, every author’s name, and the first page on which the article appears. 

Beneath the surface, capture metadata that search engines crave, such as keywords supplied by the authors, concise abstracts, the session or track where the work was presented. Feed this information into your PDF properties or your publishing platform’s fields; doing so ensures services like Google Scholar, Scopus, or Crossref can pull the data automatically and make each study discoverable.

Add Front and Back Matter

Finish the volume the way a good journal issue is finished. Open with an editor’s note that sketches the conference theme, highlights standout presentations, and thanks the review committee. 

Follow with a one-page conference overview (dates, location, delegate numbers) so future readers understand the context. 

If sponsors sponsored coffee breaks or keynote travel, acknowledge them clearly but briefly; you don’t want your gratitude to turn the proceedings into an ad, which could undermine the integrity of your conference proceedings. 

Reserve the back pages for contributor bios, a comprehensive reference list if you’re compiling one, and any additional information such as ethics statements or data-availability notes. Taken together, these elements frame the scholarly content, lend authority, and give librarians everything they need to catalogue your work.

Step 4: Assign DOIs and Prepare for Publication

With your volume compiled, you must give every paper a digital passport and decide where the finished proceedings will live. This will determine how easily scholars will find, cite, and trust your work for years to come.

Assign a DOI to Each Paper

For each academic paper, register a unique DOI through Crossref or a similar agency. A DOI is more than a stable link: it feeds standardized metadata into citation managers, ensures the article appears in indexing services, and keeps references intact even if the file moves to a new server. By stamping every manuscript and the entire volume with DOIs, you improve the discoverability, authority, and citation‐style consistency of your conference proceedings in one move.

Choose a Publication Platform

Next, match your audience’s needs with the right home:

  • An institutional repository is perfect if your university champions open access
  • An established open‐access publisher adds peer‐reviewed prestige and automated archiving
  • A partner journal offers the allure of integration into existing journals and alongside other journal articles
  • A well-tagged PDF bundle hosted on your own site can work if you maintain persistent URLs and metadata. 

Whichever route you pick, confirm that the platform supports proper referencing, long-term file preservation, and DOI resolution. Nothing negatively impacts conference proceedings faster than broken links, inadequate citations, and poor digital functionality.

Step 5: Publish, Archive, and Share

You’re ready to publish and share your conference proceedings. This final stage is equal parts digital preservation and strategic buzz-building.

Archive Digitally

Upload the master conference proceedings (plus any supplementary datasets, slide decks, or video files) to a stable, scholarly platform, such as your university repository, Zenodo, or an Open Journal Systems (OJS) site. Include full metadata for each paper, add alt text and tagged headings for accessibility, and include license information so readers know how they can reuse the work. 

Finally, store backups or use a digital preservation service for academic content like CLOCKSS or Portico.

Notify Participants and Promote

Once the files are live, send every presenter a personalized email with a direct link to their proceedings paper and its DOI. After all, authors are your loudest champions when sharing on social media, departmental newsletters, and institutional websites. 

Announce the release to your conference mailing list, post in relevant academic forums, and submit the proceedings to indexing databases that automatically harvest DOIs. 

Encourage authors to upload ResearchGate, Academia.edu, ORCID, or wherever they curate their scholarly profiles; each new backlink drives discoverability, downloads, and ultimately the citation count that proves your event’s long-term contribution.

Bonus Tips for High-Quality Proceedings

Even after you’ve cleared the big hurdles, editing, DOI registration, and publication, small quality touches can lift your conference proceedings from acceptable to genuinely impressive. Keep these tips in mind:

  1. Obsess over consistent formatting. A micro-mismatch in heading size or margin width will jar readers out of the flow. Run a final sweep to confirm that every page follows the same template, from font family to page numbers.
  2. Never skip a proof pass. One stray typo in a paper title can ricochet through Google Scholar and citation managers forever. A fresh set of eyes (preferably an academic proofreader) safeguards your conference’s hard-won reputation.
  3. Treat metadata like gold. Integrate searchable keywords and session tags in both the PDF properties and your hosting platform. 
  4. Mint DOIs at every level. Issuing a DOI for the full volume is good; assigning one to each individual symposium proceedings paper is better. Multiple identifiers make it easier for authors to cite—and for citation counts to accrue.
  5. Link the extras. If your event featured posters, video demos, or supplementary PowerPoint decks, include live links or QR codes. Multimedia files bring the static PDF to life and preserve the full context of each conference presentation.

Reference Template: What a Well-Formatted Proceedings Paper Looks Like

Standard Structure

A polished proceedings paper should read like a condensed, yet fully fledged, research article. Here’s a reliable blueprint you can share with authors:

  1. Paper title
  2. Author’s name and affiliation
  3. Abstract
  4. Research question and objective
  5. Research methodology
  6. Literature review
  7. Research findings/Results
  8. Discussion
  9. Conclusion and additional information
  10. Reference list (APA-style, IEEE, or field-specific)

    Formatting Guidelines for Uniformity

    Ensure all papers follow these technical standards:

    • Page layout: Identical size and margins across all manuscripts
    • Citation style: One system only (APA, MLA, IEEE) applied consistently
    • Headings: Numbered or styled to match your template’s hierarchy
    • Pagination: Continuous page numbers from first to last page
    • Typography: Same font family, font size and line spacing
    • Length limits: If you impose a word-count ceiling, state it clearly in the author instructions

    Streamline the Process with Conference Software Built for Proceedings

    Compiling, formatting, and publishing proceedings can take weeks of an organizer’s time. Tasks such as struggling with last-minute author revisions, checking references, and merging half a dozen manuscript versions can be daunting. 

    Fourwaves greatly reduces the hassles of organizing and publishing conference proceedings by streamlining the entire post-conference publishing workflow. It also handles the peer review process.

    Ready to see how Fourwaves shrinks post-event busywork for conference proceedings? Learn more about our conference management software.

    Writing Conference Proceedings FAQs

    Most committees aim for a timeframe of six to twelve weeks. Allocate roughly two weeks for authors to integrate final edits, another two for copy-editing and layout, and the remaining time for DOI registration, platform upload, and a last-minute quality check. Establishing and communicating these milestones early on ensures everyone stays on track.

    Begin with a mandatory template that maintains section order, heading levels, and citation style. Ensure that every manuscript is routed through a single copy editor (or team) who checks grammar, reference integrity, and visual layout against a master checklist. Finally, produce the full PDF from one source file to ensure fonts, margins, and page numbers remain consistent throughout the volume.

    Assign a DOI to each proceedings paper and to the volume itself, embed complete metadata (title, authors, abstract, keywords, session code) in both the PDF and your publishing platform, and deposit that metadata with Crossref. Many databases, like Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, store this information automatically.

    Yes, provided the journal’s policy allows prior conference versions. Authors should disclose the overlap, expand the paper beyond the proceedings length, and cite the original DOI. Most peer-reviewed journals accept this pathway, especially in fast-moving fields where conferences serve as the first public airing of new work.

    Join a registration agency, such as Crossref (either directly or through an academic publisher), create a metadata record for each paper and mint a unique DOI suffix. Embed the DOI on the article’s title page, in the PDF properties, and in the reference list so citation managers can capture it instantly.

    Host the files in a trusted repository (institutional library, Zenodo, or an OJS instance) that offers persistent URLs and preservation services like CLOCKSS or Portico. Use open, machine-readable formats (PDF/A for documents, CSV or JSON for data) and keep redundant backups in geographically separate locations.

    Secure non-exclusive publishing agreements from authors, confirm that all figures and third-party images carry the proper permissions, and include a clear licence (e.g., CC BY-NC) in the front matter. If data involve human subjects, verify that ethical approvals permit public release.

    Yes. Fourwaves offers end-to-end workflows for managing conference proceedings. Using dedicated software reduces manual errors, speeds publication, and guarantees a more professional final product.

    Next up

    Can You Submit the Same Abstract to Multiple Conferences? Rules, Risks & Policies

    Are you a researcher or research student wondering if you can submit the same abstract of a full pap...

    The Ultimate Guide to How to Organize an Academic Conference

    Are you looking for tips on how to organize an academic conference? You’ve come to the right place w...